作者:Guo, H (Guo Hong)[ 1,2,3 ] ; Gu, XF (Gu Xing-fa)[ 1,2 ] ; Xie, Y (Xie Yong)[ 1,2 ] ; Yu, T (Yu Tao)[ 1,2 ] ; Gao, HL (Gao Hai-liang)[ 1,2 ] ; Wei, XQ (Wei Xiang-qin)[ 1,2 ] ; Liu, QY (Liu Qi-yue)[ 1,2 ]
SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
卷: 34  期: 8  页: 2203-2207
DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2014)08-2203-05
出版年: AUG 2014

摘要
The present paper performed the evaluation of four dark-object subtraction(DOS) atmospheric correction methods based on 2012 Inner Mongolia experimental data. The authors analyzed the impacts of key parameters of four DOS methods when they were applied to ZY-3 CCD data. The results showed that (1) All four DOS methods have significant atmospheric correction effect at band 1, 2 and 3. But as for band 4, the atmospheric correction effect of DOS4 is the best while DOS2 is the worst; both DOS1 and DOS3 has no obvious atmospheric correction effect. (2) The relative error (RE) of DOS1 atmospheric correction method is larger than 10% at four bands; The atmospheric correction effect of DOS2 works the best at band 1(AE (absolute error) =0. 001 9 and RE=4. 32%) and the worst error appears at band 4(AE=0. 046 4 and RE=19. 12%); The RE of DOS3 is about 10% for all bands. (3) The AE of atmospheric correction results for DOS4 method is less than 0. 02 and the RE is less than 10% for all bands. Therefore, the DOS4 method provides the best accuracy of atmospheric correction results for ZY-3 image.

通讯作者地址: Gu, XF (通讯作者)
Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
地址:
[ 1 ] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[ 2 ] Beijing Normal Univ, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[ 3 ] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China